R-A-T-C-H-E-T
Enthusiast
First Sony started to get serious with modders/hackers, now Microsoft is getting serious. I can't seem to figure out which is worse between the two; Sony suing someone for modding their console or Microsoft banning all those that have been infected with mods. I personally think that both are idiotic. This is what Sony was thinking, 'Since Microsoft is making so much more money than us and has such a better online community, even though they pay for their service, why don't we go sue someone so we can pocket some cash and lose our reputation?' This is what Microsoft was thinking, 'Since Sony has such a bad reputation for suing people now, why don't we ban innocent gamers that join infected lobbies? Then after that maybe we will have a terrible reputation like Sony!' Now what does the community have to say about this?