Giraffez
That's What They All Say
Retired
Both modes are incredibly different, and I'm interested to see who prefers what and for which reasons. I've only played Battle Royale, so my opinion would be bias.
StW as well. The battle royal aspect isn’t for me imo. I am a competitive player but it’s not how I expected it to go. Just wish most people in StW were actually decent and knew how to play it better.Save The World. I'm not a competitive person and I enjoy being able to play solo. That along with the facts that the Husks are interesting and there are TONS of events for Save The World. I also am a bit of a collector for the event items/heroes.
IKR?! I don't understand how some people can be power level 30+ and still not know how to play...Just wish most people in StW were actually decent and knew how to play it better.
I noticed that STW will be free at some point this year, so that’s really holding me back from buying it. It does seem quite fun though, from what I’ve heard/seen anyway.Started with battle Royale loved and hated it (mostly because the controls ) Now I’m on PvE I believe it really helps you prepare to be a much better Royale player and the ability to acquire V-bucks is also a great addition.
PvE is underrated has a giant learning curve with a good level of difficulty, for me I vote Save the world.
Their should be a vote on this thread be interesting to see that
Battle Royale, the genre is addicting, I like PVP, and I'm not as much a story campaign gamer.Both modes are incredibly different, and I'm interested to see who prefers what and for which reasons. I've only played Battle Royale, so my opinion would be bias.
Battle Royale isn’t finished and contains more bugs my guy.Battle Royale. It is way more interesting and competive.
Save the world is not a finished game. It is still in a Beta Phase and contains bugs.