AMD Threadripper 1900X CPU; Outperforms Ryzen 7 In Productivity

AMD has come out strong this year with Ryzen and Threadripper CPUs, and the company continues to roll out more versions of its new processors. The...
  1. RSS Feed
    [​IMG]

    AMD has come out strong this year with Ryzen and Threadripper CPUs, and the company continues to roll out more versions of its new processors. The 1900X is the 8-core/16-thread CPU on the sTR4 socket and X399 platform, and it's now the cheapest option in the Threadripper family at $550.

    Those familiar with AMD's current CPU lineup might be wondering why an 8-core/16-thread Threadripper exists when the Ryzen 7 1800X ($500) sports the same core/thread count and similar clocks speeds. What differentiates the two is that the 1900X packs in many of Threadripper's advantages: quad-channel memory configuration, more PCI-express lanes, bootable NVMe RAID, and support for more USB ports. The following chart outlines the specs for Threadripper CPUs currently available:

    Threadripper 1950XThreadripper 1920XThreadripper 1900X
    Cores / Threads16 / 3212 / 248 / 16
    Base Clock Speed3.4 GHz3.5 GHz3.8 GHz
    Boost Clock Speed4.0 GHz4.0 GHz4.0 GHz
    XFR Clock Speed4.2 GHz4.2 GHz4.2 GHz
    TDP180 W180 W180 W
    PCIe Lanes646464
    Price$1000$800$550

    One drawback between Threadripper and Ryzen 7 is thermal design power (TDP), which is the maximum heat output from a processing unit and its power draw potential. The 1900X is rated at 180 watts while the 1800X is at 95 watts. Those in the market for a high-end desktop (HEDT) processor should expect to match their CPU with a robust cooling solution and power supply.

    AMD's internal benchmarks also provide some insight into PC gaming performance. Using a GTX 1080 Ti graphics card, the 1900X lags slightly behind the 1800X in Grand Theft Auto V, Deus Ex: Mankind Divided, and Hitman (in DirectX 12), but pulls ahead in Rise of the Tomb Raider.

    [​IMG]

    The real draw of the 1900X is its performance with heavy workloads in tasks like video encoding and production, and image rendering. Compared to the Ryzen 7 1800X, the Threadripper 1900X pulls ahead by 4-10% in POV-RAY, Blender, Handbrake, and Veracrypt.

    [​IMG]

    When AMD matched up the 1900X with its more powerful counterparts, it was 29-39% behind the 12-core/24 thread 1920X, and 58-73% slower than the 16-core/32 thread 1950X in the aforementioned CPU-heavy workloads. This shows the 1900X to be a great value by comparison, but it also proves the strong scalability of AMD's Zen architecture; as the core/thread count increases, performance improves accordingly.

    [​IMG]

    All three Threadripper CPUs traded blows in gaming performance with the four games mentioned earlier, but never differed more than 10 FPS.

    Source: GameSpot

    Share This Article

    Article Tags

Comments

To make a comment simply sign up and become a member!
  1. HumphreyMax
    My current Ryzen 7 1700x performs fantastically. The new AMD CPU listed here will definitely be good for folks who need that kind of horsepower. For games, my CPU is rock solid and won't need to be replaced for awhile. I'm glad to see AMD back in the game and making processors that are in equal performance if not better than Intel. On Intel's side, you can already see them releasing things that are countering these products and you can clearly tell they have been sitting on these processors for awhile. Why drive innovation if you have the market? That gives me a sour look at Intel, glad to be back on AMD.