Chrishockey55
Lifetime Premium
Lifetime
I believe Dwack was referring to after you have already cleaned the XeBuild patches. He was responding to a post about cleaning 100C0-100F0 hashes, then states that the only dirty HASH would be 0x100F0, which is correct. If he was just saying that you could dump the hypervisor from an RGH and clean the payload at 0x32500, you would be correct. Also, your two bulleted points make absolutely no sense and are completely vague. The first one is vague, but I was able to come to the conclusion that you were talking about the first bolded section. I have already debunked that statement above. As for the second point you attempted to make (assuming you are referring to the second bolded portion, but once again, vague), you simply did not write that in English so I can't exactly debunk that theory since the preposition "in" makes no sense at all. The hashes at 0x100C0, 0x100D0, and 0x100E0 are all clean on a dumped hypervisor from an RGH. Then, he continues to state that the only dirty HASH (note: hash, not referring to xebuild patches here) would be 0x100F0, which is absolutely correct. You continue to attempt to prove people with a much greater knowledge base than you incorrect, but each time you look like even more of a fool. Good day.
If he was just saying that you could dump the hypervisor from an RGH and clean the payload at 0x32500, you would be correct.
The only part you would need to clean is the 0x32500.
That's excatly what he said.