There is a rumor that bunige made reach not as good as past Halo's so that 343 can fix everything and the fanbase would have an easier time trusting 343 so that halo wouldn't lose it's fanbase for Halo 4. What do you think about this?
Why would they do that? Every game company is about Greed. Bungie basically created Halo, so why would they make Reach terrible? If they new it was a terrible game why would they make DLC for it? Or update it or do anything to try and make it better? I think they are just trying to save their asses.
Halo was Bungie's baby, if it wasn't for Microsoft they would still be the ones making it so I highly doubt this, but anything is possible.
If I recall correctly, didnt bungie say that Halo: Reach was made "for the fans", and was a game that "fans" deserved? I dont know.. I think they put too much effort into something to try and make it more noob-friendly", and the end result was the game backfiring on their goals. Well, it is more noob-friendly than any of the other Halos, so I guess they succeeded there :S
He never said anybody said it was true. He obviously is the one saying it's true. So there for, somebody did say it is true.
It wasn't captivating like Halo 3. It was more like meh, this is still better than Call of Duty. (imo)
How can you say that when all you do is talk about Reach? All you do is compare everything to Reach. I honestly have seen a bigger hypocrite....
